Cramer’s Rule
Solving a square system by ratios of determinants, read geometrically as the factors by which each side of a parallelogram must be dilated.
8 exercises
Exercise 1
Use Cramer’s Rule to solve each for each of the variables.
-
(a) (b)
Exercise 2
Use Cramer’s Rule to solve this system for .
Exercise 3
Prove Cramer’s Rule.
Exercise 4
Here is an alternative proof of Cramer’s Rule that doesn’t overtly contain any geometry. Write for the identity matrix with column replaced by the vector of unknowns , …, .
-
Observe that .
-
Take the determinant of both sides.
Exercise 5
Suppose that a linear system has as many equations as unknowns, that all of its coefficients and constants are integers, and that its matrix of coefficients has determinant . Prove that the entries in the solution are all integers. (Remark. This is often used to invent linear systems for exercises.)
Exercise 6
Use Cramer’s Rule to give a formula for the solution of a two equations/two unknowns linear system.
Exercise 7
Can Cramer’s Rule tell the difference between a system with no solutions and one with infinitely many?
Exercise 8
The first picture in this Topic (the one that doesn’t use determinants) shows a unique solution case. Produce a similar picture for the case of infinitely many solutions, and the case of no solutions.
Adapted from Linear Algebra © 2016 Jim Hefferon. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 US. Source: Linear Algebra. Imported at revision df2262e.