AI Tutor
Library
›Library›Logic›forall x: Calgary›First-order logic›Identity
Back to forall x: Calgary

Identity

Using the identity predicate to symbolize 'except' and 'only' claims, and explaining what quantified sentences built on identity assert.

forall x: Calgary, Identity

Status
FlagsLoading your progress…

2 exercises

Exercise A

Consider the sentence,

  1. Every officer except Pavel owes money to Hikaru.

Symbolize this sentence, using ‘F(x)F(x)’ for ‘‾x\underline{\hskip 15.00002pt}_{x} is an officer’. Are you confident that your symbolization is true if, and only if, an exercise given elsewhere in the bookexcept2 is true? What happens if every officer owes money to Hikaru, Pavel does not, but Pavel isn’t an officer?

3.0

Exercise B

Explain why:

  1. ‘∃x∀y(A(y)↔x=y)\exists x\forall y(A(y)\leftrightarrow x=y)’ is a good symbolization of ‘there is exactly one apple’.

  2. ‘∃x∃y[¬x=y∧∀z(A(z)↔(x=z∨y=z)]\exists x\exists y\bigl[\neg x=y\wedge\forall z(A(z)\leftrightarrow(x=z\vee y=z)\bigr]’ is a good symbolization of ‘there are exactly two apples’.

3.0
Multiple generalitySentences of FOL

Adapted from forall x: Calgary © 2025 P. D. Magnus, Tim Button, Robert Trueman, and Richard Zach. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. Source: forall x: Calgary. Imported at revision ec34df8.

AI Tutor

A study tool built on open educational resources. Content from OpenStax and other openly licensed textbooks — every book, section and exercise page carries its source’s license and attribution.

Product
  • About AI Tutor
  • Library
  • Premium
Legal
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
© 2026 AI Tutor. Openly licensed content is attributed to its authors under their respective licenses.